position etnomenologi
1 . Etomenologi including qualitative research clumps that move from phenomenology paradigam
2 . Phenomenology is a philosophical doctrine that contemporary assumptions - essentially laid by Edmund Husserl ( 1859-1938 ) . As an epistemology , phenomenology using intuition as a means to reach the truth
Previous research etnomenologi
• Garfinkel is the inventor etnomenologi (1967 ) , which discussed in great detail the case of a young man who changed sex to become a woman
• Garfinkel early to tell how the change was made . How to change roles and new friends including how the first time sharing a room with another woman .
Research focus ethnometodology
Etnomenologi focus of study is not only the person or people as a single selfhood or Baian but as members of a wider dues structures whether it be public or other forms . So the interview is not only to know the questions yet Answer2 rules or structures that make individual ( person ) that produces the response actions .
Research Stages Etnomenologi
• An interview is actually quite crucial as a way to obtain information . Assumption of the interview method is guest speaker will honestly answer questions and tell the motive behind every action .
• This study specifies for the anlisis much conversation or analysis wacanana but there are also non- verbal interactions involve .
• The main data collection technique is the observation of data etnomenologi
Validity and reliability ethnometodology
• Measuring the concept with a certain measure appropriate . In etnomenologi study , how to look at the validity of fairly simple . Because it does not use conventional methods to measure a concept .
• The term eleniasi example can not be seen directly . In ethnometodology , terms aleniasi closer grounded theory techniques . For example by observing the regulations that can be observed from the outside and then to label or a particular identity .
excess ethnometodology
1 . longitudinal nature
• As an ongoing observational methods
• ethnometodology can record changes parubahan what happened and do not have to awaken ourselves to the memories of participants .
2 . Verbal and non- verbal behaviors learned in ethnometodology
3 . Provide an understanding of how the respondents were aware of or feel completely conscious and understand the research activities and how they answer questions.
weakness ethnometodology
1 . For large-scale or large -scale public attitudes more appropriate to use the survey method compared ethnometodology
ethnometodology garfinkeld
Can be defined as a branch of sociology itself. As already noted above , is ethnometodology resistance movement with people of sociology . That disclosure of the reality of the life world of the individual or society .
1 . Departing from a critique of positivism in sociological research bias . Understanding of social phenomena is not enough to stop the conclusion of the cause - wherefores of social phenomena tnapa internal aspects of individual attention .
2 . Social fact is the production of individual interpretive acts as a response to life . Ethnometodology willing to do a scientific study that aims to understand the nature think of individuals in actions in daily life - days
3 . Position seen as a renewal of studies in sociology , ethnometodology has some similarities with the approach of phenomenology , symbolic interaction , Talcott Parson .
4 . The basic assumptions laid by Husserl as an epistemology , phenomenology using intuition as a means to reach the truth .
5 . Examples of research Garfinkel peel with a very detailed case of a young man who changed sex to become a woman .
6 . Garfinkel early to tell how the change was made . how changing roles and new friends including how the first time sharing a room with another woman .
7 . The focus of his research is not just people as individuals naumn as a member or part of their wider output structure whether it be public or other forms. So the interview is not only to know the answer - an answer to the question but the rules or structures that help individuals produce tindakn - the action or response .
8 . Ethnometodology research stage : Interview is actually quite crucial as a way to obtain information . Assumption of the interview method is guest speaker will honestly answer questions and tell the motive behind every action .
9 . The study many specialize in conversation analysis or discourse analysis involving anamun there are also non- verbal interaction .
10 . The main data collection techniques in ethnometodology is observation .
11 . Validity and reliability ethnometodology
12 . Measuring the concept with a certain measure appropriate . In ethnometodology study , how to look at the validity of fairly simple . Because it does not use the way - in a conventional way to measure a concept .
13 . The term alienation ( alienation ) for example can not be seen directly . More alienation techniques grounded theory approach . For example by observing the rules - rules that can be observed from the outside and then to label or a particular identity .
preliminary
Methodology is an important issue in science or science . To obtain a systematic knowledge , any researcher even scientists need methodology . Methodology is defined ways with a certain logic to see reality or phenomenon by scientists . There are two main research methodologies in the social sciences , namely quantitative and qualitative approaches . Epistemologically , is quantitatively derived from positivism . Positivism is an understanding in science and philosophy which assumes that the true knowledge is knowledge that is based on positive facts obtained through the sensing process .
Quantitative approach places great emphasis on objectivism and use statistical tools . While the qualitative approach emphasizes subjectivism . Qualitative approach as expressed by Bogdan and Tylor is a research procedure that produces descriptive data in the form of speech or writing and the observable behavior of the people ( subjects ) themselves . This approach directly shows the setting and the individuals in the setting as a whole , individuals within the limits of a very holistic ( Furchan , 1992 ) . Jane Richie defines qualitative research as an attempt to presentation of the social world , and perspektifperspektif in the world , in terms of concepts , behavior , perception and the question of human diteli . While Moleong (2004 ) limit the qualitative research as research that aims to understand the phenomenon of what is experienced by research subjects such as behavior , perception , motivation , and other actions in a holistic manner and by way of description in the form of words and language in a context special nature and by utilizing a variety of scientific methods .
Discusses the types of research may actually bring up the debate , because one book with another book that gives the classification which different types of research . There are writers who seem to equate with the type of methods . Palys (1992 ) for example , classifies the types of research in :
1 ) direct contact methods ( eg, interviews , discussions , use of projection equipment )
2 ) observational methods
3 ) unobtrusive method ( not reactive ) and archives ( eg, work study , diaries , and other forms of heritage ) .
Meanwhile , there are authors who interpret the type of research as ' design ' . Punch (1998 ) for example , classify the qualitative research design , case studies , ethnography and grounded theory . Meanwhile Denzin and Lincoln (1994 ) seems to understand the types of research on the nature and / or research approach , for example by dividing the types of research in , among others , case studies ; ethnography and participant observation ; phenomenology , ethnometodology , interpretive practices , methods biography , and clinical research . Some other books seem to classify ' types ' of research objectives in particular . In this case , the method is no method that can be used in different types of research types . The emphasis is that the method chosen metodeyang will help achieve the specific objectives of the research .
Definition and Concept ethnometodology
Neuman (1997 ) defines as a whole ethnometodology discoveries , methods , theories , a view of the world . Ethnometodology view comes from life . Ethnometodology trying to describe reality at a level that exceeds sociology , and this makes it different from a lot of sociology and psychology . Ethnometodology study has limitations as common sense , the study of the creation of the observations used in the continuous social interaction with the environment is reasonable . In terminology , ethnometodology
translated as a method of organizing society needs to look at several aspects , including: the enlightenment and empowerment . Ethnometodology is not a method used by researchers to collect data , but rather refers to the problem of what will be studied . Ethnometodology is the study of how people create and understand the day-to- day life , his method for achieving everyday life . Etnometodologididasarkan on the idea that the day-to- day activities and social interactions that are routine , and the public , may be done through various forms of expertise , practical work , and certain assumptions . Skills , practical work , and assumptions that are referred to in ethnometodology .
Ethnometodology main goal is to learn how members of the public during the course of social interaction , make sense of indexical expression . Indexical term is not universal but depends significantly on the context ( eg , he , she , they ) . Are limited to an indexed or referenced subject ethnometodology not members of indigenous tribes , but the people in perbagai of situations in our society . Etnometodologiberusaha understand how people are starting to see , explain , and outlines the order of the world in which they hidup.Pemanfaatan this method is backed by practical thinking ( practical reasoning) rather than by the benefit of formal logic ( formal logic ) .
Ethnometodology ditakrifkan as the study of knowledge , and consideration of a variety of procedures that can be understood by the common people . Such communities can find ways and can act in a state where they could find himself ( Ritzer , 1996) .
Historical Methods ethnometodology
Method ethnometodology born during the golden age of development of modernist or qualitative research . At the time of the qualitative approach and formalizing the process of growth of a new kind of interpretive methods . Besides a passion for voicing the lower class, the scholars of that era also returned to the Chicago school to match the argument about the internal and external validity . The golden age has significance in creating confidence in the power of the people and hang on gagasangagasan emancipatory .
In the study ethnometodology , pretty simple way of looking validity , because it usually is not used conventional ways to measure a concept . For example, the concept of alienation is closer etnometodologimelihat grounded theory techniques , for example by observing the regulations that bias was observed from the outside, then give him a certain label or identity . While reliability can be seen from the results The comparison with other similar methods . Therefore , here is very dependent on the power of interpretation of the researcher to the social problem at hand . However, because of the same problem in terms of the different methods , then the result will be relatively the same ( different ) . Errors that can and often arise is in cases
are ambiguous ( ambiguous ) , or cases that have interpreted different opportunities .
Harold Garfinkel mid- 1950s , introduced the term ethnometodology in the field of social research which is the inspiration for the creation of phenomenological sociology . Garfinkel raised or developed at the start of the study looking into the phenomenology of Alfred Schutz at the New School For Social Research . There is a strong presumption that the phenomenology of Schutz greatly affect ethnometodology Grafinkel . This is evident from the assumptions as well as the establishment itself darietnometodologi . For Schutz , the everyday world is an inter- subjective world owned with others with whom we interact .
Inter- subjective world itself consists of a very double realitasrealitas where everyday reality appears as the primary reality . Schutz gives attention to the everyday world that is common sense . Realities such as these be taken for granted where the exclusion of doubt , but the reality in question . Schutz 's discussion realitascommon sense perspective implement a member Garfinkel
ethnometodology studies as well as the theoretical basis for other research ethnometodology . The definition of social reality by Schutz is a " whole objects and events in the cultural and social world , which is turned on by the general thoughts of people living together with a number of interactions . It is a world of cultural objects and social institutions in which we are all born , know each other , since the beginning connected , we , the actors on the social stage , underwent the world as a cultural world as well as the natural world , not as a private world , but the world inter- subjective , meaning that as a world common to us all that unfolded before us or that potentially can be enjoyed by anyone of us , and this has implications for the communication and language " .
While the effect is the theory ethnometodology Parsons in action / measures introduced by Parsons . In action theory , Parson found the motivation that drives an individual action is always based on rules or norms that exist in a society where an individual lives . Motivation is fused with the actor model of normative models set in a society devoted to maintaining social stability itself. Parsons assumption is in line with the establishment ethnometodology , especially from Garfinkel and Douglas who said that someone in the assign something whether action / behavior , language , response or reaction is always based on what is already accepted as a truth with the public ( common sense ) . Ethnometodology term became popular in the 1960s up to the 1970s and is now widely accepted as the scientific method . The researchers of this genre began to show the interpretive practices of the world in order to prove that objectivity is achieved and managed locally to refer to a broad range of social resources ( social and cultural ) that connects what is referred to by Garfinkel as ' art ' with an interpretive structure that has been established . Garfinkel itself is a lecturer at UCLA in the West Coast . Grafinkel comes after several experts who develop such studietnometodologi Jack Douglas , Egon Bittner , Aaron Cicourel , Roy Turner , Don Zimmerman and D. Lawrence Wieder .
In practice , ethnometodology Grafinkel highlight the strengths or hearing and through simulation experiments . Observation or hearing Grafinkel used when doing research on a store . Meanwhile , Jack Douglas use etnometodolgi process used to investigate the coronary ( employees who examine causes of death to determine a person's death as a result of suicide . Douglas noted that in order to determine it , coroners have to use common sense notion that what is known by every one of the reasons people commit suicide as a basis set the deliberate ( Furchan , 1992) .
Ethnometodology not be construed as research methods used to collect the data , but is more focused on how to choose the subject matter to be studied . This is as described by Harold Garfinkel , that the term ethnometodology met when he studied at the Yale cross-cultural archives that contain words such as ethnobotany , etnofisika , etnomusik , and etnoastronomi . It has a sense of how the citizens of a particular group ( usually ethnic group located in the Yale archives ) understanding , using , and managing aspects of their environment . In the Matter of ethnobotany , the subject or the subject is the study of plants .
Thus ethnometodology means the study of how individuals create and understand their daily lives , how they complete the work in every day life . Garfinkel defines ethnometodology as a survey on indexical expressions and other practical actions as contingent settlement is being made of the practices of everyday life are organized .
Ethnometodology work by Garfinkel (1967 ) study of how people as supporters of the unusual order using the properties of the order for that to happen for the citizens of traits that seem real organized . Experts seek ethnometodology how people perceive , explain , and provide order in a world where hidupnya.Etnometodologi has been successful in getting researchers to be sensitive to the issue , the study itself is not a typical scientific efforts , but rather seen as an achievement of practical work ( Bogdan and Biklen , 1990) . Ethnometodology meaningless ' research methods to collect the data ' . Ethnometodology is a review of the process undertaken by human individuals to build and understand the day-to- day life .
Ethnometodology study subject is not isolated tribes , but the ordinary people we meet everyday . Ethnometodology researching small things and trivial 'living' in the community . Penelitietnometodologi people even believe that the study itself does not have to mean a very unique scientific activity , but can also be done for practical matters and day-to- day affairs . Etnometodologimenekankan and acknowledge the fact that ordinary people ( lay public ) try to recognize social explanation as practiced by scientists . Further common sense trying to explain that members of the public to create and run social sense ( social solidarity ) continuously.
Ethnometodology method has a different color than the study of other qualitative methods . Starting from the phenomenological tradition , which developed social phenomenology Schultz , ethnometodology then develop themselves through the analytic of the fundamental laws , and were enriched in various construction , which includes conversation analysis and interpretive rules .
Studies focus ethnometodology
In the ethnometodology , researchers ' from outside ' should be united and be directly involved in the research process together with ' local social actors ' . Researchers should be able to melt in the community under study , and must be able to be karenannya together with the communities studied in a complex social vessel . It is more emphasized in ethnometodology are events occurring naturally in the community . In that event lasted patterns of interaction that can be read and interpreted explicitly . Patterns of interaction in question is the interaction of individuals ( social actors ) and the interaction between the person and his environment ( institutional and natural ) . Researchers and social actors will be involved in the interaction and the intense discussion to formulate the problem.
Resulting social reality ' of the ' interpretive procedures through its members . Social conditions of the members are selfgenerating . This trait shows two important properties of meaning successfully revealed by researchers . First , the meaning of which is an index previously , the meaning of which depends on koteks . In a sense , objects and events had meaning ambiguous or uncertain , with no clear context . Only through the use of which depends on the situation in the conversations and interactions , and events into meaningful abjek concretely . Second , the conditions that give context to the meaning itself is selfgenerating . Interpretive activities take place simultaneously in and around the settings into the orientation and dideskripsikannya . So , the reality is achieved socially reflective .
Descriptive statements about the settings simultaneously formed by setting the
formation ( Denzin & Lincoln , 1994) . Researchers and social actors ( sources ) must be on an equal footing , to exchange experiences ( vis a vis ) , intense social interaction ( interpretive coparticipants ) , and have the same rights ( including the right to dissent ) . Process of reaching an agreement on a compromise between the two is done , each using common sense . What is meant by the world common sense is something that is usually taken for granted , the assumptions are behind it and the meaning understood together .
In this way , local communities will better understand their needs (sense
of order ) , so that the community development plan is largely determined by the accumulation of their discourse . Researchers in ethnometodology seems to be a good partisan figure , an honest writer , and a friendly facilitator . Held academic logic will be tested by researchers dalametnometodologi antarsubjek experience in academic dialogue process so that the logic of common sense would mingle with the local community . Ethnometodology method implies a reasonable expectation . Even though this method does not have a direct relationship with the development of a new theory , but how it works in peeling the role of social actors will uncover enough suppleness social data . Way social actors carry out their duties can explain where they live : learn to deal with the problem , choosing an alternative , and implement consistently choice .
In ethnometodology method , data in social research is a social actor acts which, though not stated explicitly in the form of verbal or complete , but continues to be recognized and can be done ( through telephone conversations , laughter , applause , interactive statement to the formulation of speech ) .
While it was known five principles in analyzing conversation by Zimmerman (1978 ) , namely :
1 ) Collection and analysis of very detailed data about the conversation
2 ) small aspects of conversation is not only governed by the expert ethnometodology but at first by the actor himself
3 ) The interaction and conversation is a stable and orderly . Researchers are autonomous , separate from the actor
4 ) Framework fundamental conversation is orderly organization
5 ) The series of conversational interaction is managed on the basis of place or take turns .
Methodologically , trying to learn conversational analysis in the context of a conversation in a reasonable , often using a tape recorder . The basic assumption of conversation analysis consists of :
1 ) Conversation is the foundation of inter- personal relationships forms
2 ) Is a form of interaction is most easily absorbed , and
3 ) The conversation consists of a matrix of communication procedures and practices are the most organized .
In everyday life , the use of language is not solely based on the principle of well-formed in the syntax , but rather on the basis of that communication can still run so that the language ethnometodology diguakan by the speech community as a way of understanding the interaction of the participants what they ujarkan . During its development , the focus kajianetnometodologi diverse behaviors of everyday life , therefore appears many types of advanced studies in accordance with the discipline itself.
Ritzer (1996 ) describe a number of variations ethnometodology work .
1 ) Study ethnometodology background in institutional analysis ( studies of institutional settings ) . Studietnometodologi who first performed occurs in the setting of ' en passant ' and non - institutional , like at home . Then , the study develops ethnometodology to study the daily practices within the broader institutional setting , such as in court , medical clinic and police station . Such studies aim to understand how the people in these settings perform their official duties in the process of formation of institutions , and
2 ) Study ethnometodology paying attention to the conversation analysis ( conversation analysis) , in order to understand in detail the fundamental structure of conversational interaction . Ritzer (1996 ) summarizes the basics of conversational analysis into five premises , namely :
a. Conversation analysis requires collection and analysis of detailed data . This data includes not only words but also keraguraguan , sigh , sob , laughter , non- verbal behavior and a variety of other activities . It describes the act of conversation all actors involved ;
b . Details of the conversation should be regarded as an achievement . These aspects are not regulated by ethnometodology conversation , but by methodical activity of the actors themselves ;
c . General interaction and conversation in particular has properties stable and regular to the success of the actors would be involved ;
d . Conversation is a fundamental cornerstone of sequential organization , and
e . Attachment to the conversation interaction regulated by local or rotating basis .
In general, three basic approaches can be distinguished in the qualitative data obtained through interviews :
1 . Informal interviews , the interview process is based entirely on the development of the questions spontaneously in natural interaction . Thus this type of interview is generally conducted by researchers who conduct participant observation . In such a situation , the people they are talking to may not be aware that he is being systematically interviewed to obtain data :
2 . Interviews with general guidelines , which in this interview process , the researcher has an interview guide ( interview guide ) were very common , which includes issues that must be covered without specifying the order of questions , perhaps even without the explicit form of the question . Interview guide is used to alert researchers about aspects that should be discussed , as well as a list checker ( checklist ) whether the relevant aspects have been discussed or questioned . With such guidelines , researchers should consider how the question will be translated concretely in the interrogative sentence , as well as adjust the actual context questions during the interview . Interview with the very general guidelines can be shaped focused interview , the interview that direct talks on halhal / certain aspects of life / experience of the subject . But interviews can also be shaped in-depth interviews , where researchers ask questions about various aspects of the subject's life , in full and in-depth ;
3 . Interview with standardized guidelines are open , ie, in the form of interviews , interview guides are written in detail , complete with a set of questions and the explanations in the sentence . Researchers are expected to conduct the interviews according to the listed sequences , and ask the same way on different sources . Limited flexibility to explore answers , depending on the nature of the interview and research skills . This form will be effectively done when researchers involve many interviewers , so researchers need to administer specific measures to minimize variation , as well as taking steps uniform approach to the sources ( Patton , 1990) .
Ethnometodology have some assumptions that can be explained from the perspective of the study ( McQuarie , 1995) , as follows :
( 1 ) The occurrence of the principle of reciprocal ( back and forth ) in order to equalize the understanding between researchers and social actors involved , so we can say ' that someone embraced the truth is the truth embraced by others '
( 2 ) Objectivity and ketidakraguan of what looks , for example the world or environment or reality , is that there appeared to be , and doubts about the reality ought to doubt
( 3 ) The existence of the same process . In a sense , when something happens somewhere in the future , then it will be able to occur at other times and places
( 4 ) The process of indexicality , ie ' glossary of terms ' . Society has a vocabulary of local knowledge that has been known previously and can refer to other indices have also been there . Researchers must understand the process to be able to have a broader knowledge
( 5 ) The reflectifity process , the ' description of meaning ' , or an interpretation of the situation so that there is generally no need to be defined . To say someone was ' guilty ' or ' innocent ' , then it must be derived from a general sense to the particular understanding of what it means . However , researchers have never actually seen the truth of it , but just look at the truth or with respect to the truth .
To get the truth , researchers should not be allowed to ' force ' people . The lag to be reckoned with , for example, when social actors feel ' tired ' or lead kepenampilan emotion . Therefore , in digging up information , researchers are not allowed to impose the resource persons to obtain a clear proof . Expression of apology researcher is a wise decision . Researchers must understand all of it for what it is , and not forced to get clear information that it may cause due to the invalidity of the data . Ethnometodology practices with the community as a field of study have implications derived from the limitations of human nature itself, such as :
a. Concerning the existence of society . If there is no question about the reality of which is formed with , the community actually formed together through emotion
b . Limitations of human knowledge will lead to action or thought that reducing the difficulty associated with indexicality ( glossary of terms ) and reflectivity ( an overview of the meaning ) . As a result , the reality is always assumed to be in the normal state
c . Problems or lack of knowledge of human weakness can be overcome by the selection of a rational action , exchange , symbolic interaction , and so on . Therefore , ethnometodology a fairly sharp criticism in science . Here , the action taken is the thinking that is based on knowledge of ' limited ' it ( Salim , 2006) .
Ethnometodology As Qualitative Research Methods .
Some prerequisites to make ethnometodology as a model of qualitative research :
1 . Ethnometodology study focused on the reality that has practical interpretation . He is an approach to human nature which includes the real meaning of the behavior . Every community in this concept have a situation that is local , organized , have a special steriotipe and ideology , including race , social class and gender . This approach will pro down with a very populist ideology
2 . Is a strategy that can be done through discourse analysis ( discourse analysis ) . Semiotic paradigm is adopted , so that the most appropriate method is dialogue . Data sources can be determined through observations with regular data recording using field note.Pengembangan done betuk verbal questions , interactive and social dialogue
3 . Ethnometodology has an advantage in approaching empirical life , in this case there is the emphasis given program . Perform data retrieval directly from the field through an interactive model between researchers and actors
4 . Social ( participatory observation )
5 . Emphasis on self-understanding and experiences of everyday life . Depth interview data retrieval , will dig all the problems of everyday life in the form of an open conversation interview . Every conversation discourse analysis , developed in the context of everyday life in the local community .
Advantage and disadvantage ethnometodology
In the use of methods ethnometodology found several advantages over other methods , including :
1 ) Longitudinal : as an ongoing method of observation , ethnometodology perubahanperubahan can record what happened , and not have to rely on the memories of participants like recording in a cross -sectional survey study .
2 ) Both verbal and nonverbal behavior , both studied by ethnometodology .
3 ) ethnometodology provide an understanding of how speakers recognize or feel completely conscious and understand the existing list of questions and how to answer them . This study provides evidence for the benefit of researchers in analyzing the 'no response ' as often experienced by survey research
4 ) ethnometodology provide an understanding of the consistency reliabilities are sometimes obtained by coder - coder ( encoder ) which follow the rules of common sense .
Besides having the advantage , ethnometodology have drawbacks such as:
1 ) Product : ethnometodology is not a good choice for researching and studying social products . For example, in conducting the study should not be examined about certain ethnic attitudes by using ethnometodology , although the bias used to study the process of berasalnya attitude or earlier .
2 ) Studies on a wide scale : public attitudes on a wide scale more suited examined using survey methods compared with ethnometodology . In addition , it is the attitude that only a good product when examined using survey research methods , or other methods are not ethnometodology
conclusion
Occurrences ethnometodology method as a form of dissent from conventional sociological approaches are considered to curb freedom of the researcher . Conventional researchers always include assumptions , theoretical propositions and categories that the researcher is not free in the understanding of social reality in a situation where the true social progress. Ethnometodology aimed to examine the rules of everyday social interactions are based on common sense , which is something that is usually taken for granted , the assumptions behind them and understand common sense . Ethnometodology core of common sense is revealed the world of everyday life .
Ethnometodology institutional study objectives are to understand the way people , in institutional settings , perform their work tasks and processes that occur within the institution . This study focuses on the structure , formal rules and formal procedures to explain what people do in it . In this case the use of procedures that are useful not only for everyday life , but also to produce institutions . Meanwhile , conversation analysis aims to understand in detail the fundamental structure interaction through conversation . Conversation as a basic element in the interaction activity ethnometodology is showing a steady and regular activity that is an activity that can be analyzed . Target analysis of conversations is limited to what is said in percakapanitu own . Conversation is seen as an internal sequential order . Ethnometodology tradition , which is a branch of sociology that studies the way the members of the speech community ( speech community ) to organize and understand their activities .
In ethnometodology , not based on aspects of language studied kegramatikalannya , but by way of mutual interaction of the participants understand what they ujarkan . In other words , the study of language in ethnometodology more emphasis on communication , not grammar .
Komentar